Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft, et al v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, et al
AIDE AUGUSTE and SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA |
EGLISE BAPTISTE BETHANIE DE FT. LAUDERDALE, INC., a Florida Not-For-Profit Corporation and ANDY SAINT-REMY |
20-10173 |
January 15, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc., et al. v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for injunction pending appeal filed by Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9028366-1] [20-10173] (ECF: Lawrence Metsch) [Entered: 03/08/2020 11:21 PM] |
Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellants Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. 1 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 03/09/2020 04:14 PM] |
Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES] by Appellants Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. [20-10173] (ECF: Lawrence Metsch) [Entered: 03/02/2020 11:16 PM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellants Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. [Entered: 03/02/2020 11:25 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kristie Hatcher-Bolin Appellee, Seminole Tribe of Florida [20-10173] (ECF: Kristie Hatcher-Bolin) [Entered: 02/25/2020 04:13 PM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. [20-10173] (ECF: Lawrence Metsch) [Entered: 02/24/2020 01:50 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mark Christopher Johnson for Aide Auguste. [20-10173] (ECF: Mark Johnson) [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:27 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Veronika Balbuzanova for Appellee, Aida Auguste [20-10173] (ECF: Veronika Balbuzanova) [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:31 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Abdul-Sumi Dalal for Aide Auguste. [20-10173] (ECF: Abdul-Sumi Dalal) [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:25 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mark Christopher Johnson for Appellee Aide Auguste. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10173] (ECF: Mark Johnson) [Entered: 02/12/2020 04:24 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mr. Mark D. Schellhase for Seminole Tribe of Florida. [20-10173] (ECF: Mark Schellhase) [Entered: 02/11/2020 04:28 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Mr. Mark D. Schellhase for Appellee Seminole Tribe of Florida. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10173] (ECF: Mark Schellhase) [Entered: 02/11/2020 04:50 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Lawrence Richard Metsch for Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/30/2020 08:56 AM] |
Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 01/24/2020 09:09 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lawrence R. Metsch for Appellants Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc., et al. Lawrence Richard Metsch for Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. [20-10173] (ECF: Lawrence Metsch) [Entered: 01/20/2020 07:50 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Lawrence Richard Metsch for Appellants Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. [20-10173] (ECF: Lawrence Metsch) [Entered: 01/20/2020 08:24 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Lawrence Richard Metsch for Appellants Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10173] (ECF: Lawrence Metsch) [Entered: 01/20/2020 10:00 PM] |
Appellate fee was paid on 01/14/2020 as to Appellant Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc.. [Entered: 01/15/2020 11:48 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. and Andy Saint-Remy on 01/14/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/24/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/29/2020 as to Appellant Eglise Baptiste Bethanie De Ft. Lauderdale, Inc.. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/12/2020 as to Appellees Aide Auguste and Seminole Tribe of Florida [Entered: 01/15/2020 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.