Edwin Diaz v. Miami-Dade County, et al
EDWIN DIAZ |
HOWARD ROSEN, Individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Chief of the Special Prosecution for the Miami-Dade State Attorney, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY and MATTHEW FRYER, In his Official Capacity as Sergeant, Miami-Dade Police Department |
20-10245 |
January 21, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Edwin Diaz v. Miami-Dade County, et al. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's brief filed by Edwin Diaz. [20-10245] (ECF: Jonathan Heller) [Entered: 03/16/2020 09:40 PM] |
Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 03/05/2020 11:15 AM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Jonathan Adam Heller for Appellant Edwin Diaz. [Entered: 02/28/2020 11:20 AM] |
ORDER: Motion for Leave to File Civil Appeal Statement Out of Time filed by Appellant Edwin Diaz is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9017395-2 ] [Entered: 02/28/2020 11:18 AM] |
Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Jonathan Adam Heller for Appellant Edwin Diaz. Appellants brief due on 03/02/2020; Extension Granted to 03/16/2020 as to Appellant Edwin Diaz. Appendix due on 03/23/2020 as to Appellant Edwin Diaz. [Entered: 02/26/2020 12:37 PM] |
MOTION for leave to file Civil Appeal Statement out of time filed by Edwin Diaz. Motion is Unopposed. [9017395-1] [20-10245] (ECF: Jonathan Heller) [Entered: 02/25/2020 10:13 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Oscar Edmund Marrero for Howard Rosen. [20-10245] (ECF: Oscar Marrero) [Entered: 02/18/2020 01:14 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lourdes E. Wydler for Howard Rosen. [20-10245] (ECF: Lourdes Wydler) [Entered: 02/18/2020 01:16 PM] |
Notice of deficient Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Oscar Edmund Marrero for Howard Rosen. Counsel must file an Appearance of Counsel form within 3-days of this notice. [Entered: 02/18/2020 10:00 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10245] (ECF: Oscar Marrero) [Entered: 02/14/2020 04:47 PM] |
Attorney Jonathan Adam Heller for Appellant Edwin Diaz has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:32 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Alexandra Christine Hayes for Howard Rosen. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:30 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Zachary Edward Vosseler for Matthew Fryer and Miami-Dade County. [20-10245] (ECF: Zachary Vosseler) [Entered: 02/06/2020 11:04 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Jonathan Adam Heller for Edwin Diaz. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/06/2020 10:41 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Zachary Edward Vosseler for Appellees Matthew Fryer and Miami-Dade County. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10245] (ECF: Zachary Vosseler) [Entered: 02/06/2020 11:06 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10245] (ECF: Jonathan Heller) [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:47 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jonathan Adam Heller for Edwin Diaz. [20-10245] (ECF: Jonathan Heller) [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:46 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Edwin Diaz on 01/17/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. The appellant's brief is due on or before 03/02/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/04/2020 as to Appellant Edwin Diaz. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/18/2020 as to Appellee Miami-Dade County [Entered: 01/28/2020 12:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Edwin Diaz v. Miami-Dade County, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: EDWIN DIAZ | |
Represented By: | Jonathan Adam Heller |
Represented By: | Ignacio Miguel Alvarez |
Represented By: | Carlos Fernando Gonzalez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: HOWARD ROSEN, Individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Chief of the Special Prosecution for the Miami-Dade State Attorney | |
Represented By: | Lourdes E. Wydler |
Represented By: | Alexandra Christine Hayes |
Represented By: | Oscar Edmund Marrero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY | |
Represented By: | Ashley Moody |
Represented By: | Bernard Pastor |
Represented By: | Zachary Edward Vosseler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MATTHEW FRYER, In his Official Capacity as Sergeant, Miami-Dade Police Department | |
Represented By: | Ashley Moody |
Represented By: | Bernard Pastor |
Represented By: | Zachary Edward Vosseler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.