Donald Jones v. Bank of America, et al
| STATE OF FLORIDA and BANK OF AMERICA |
| DONALD JONES |
| 20-10548 |
| February 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order: ORDERED: Plaintiff must FILE a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on or before March 11, 2020. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee by that date as to Appellant Donald Jones was filed on 02/26/2020. Docket Entry 22. [Entered: 04/08/2020 08:33 AM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Donald Jones failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/17/2020 12:04 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Donald Jones. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/05/2020 09:27 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Donald Jones on 02/12/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/26/2020 as to Appellant Donald Jones [Entered: 02/14/2020 04:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
