Timothy Weakley v. Attorney General State of Ala
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant: TIMOTHY WEAKLEY
Case Number: 20-10580
Filed: February 14, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2020 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Timothy Weakley. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9057449-1] [Entered: 04/09/2020 10:14 AM]
April 8, 2020 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Timothy Weakley. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9057452-1] [Entered: 04/09/2020 10:16 AM]
April 8, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Timothy Weakley. [Entered: 04/09/2020 10:17 AM]
March 24, 2020 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in this Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 03/24/2020 08:38 AM]
March 6, 2020 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney John J. Davis for Appellee Attorney General State of Alabama. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10580] (ECF: John Davis) [Entered: 03/06/2020 10:26 AM]
March 3, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by John J. Davis for Attorney General State of Alabama and Steven Marshall for Attorney General State of Alabama. [20-10580] (ECF: John Davis) [Entered: 03/03/2020 02:53 PM]
March 2, 2020 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Timothy Weakley. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/02/2020 10:34 AM]
February 18, 2020 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Timothy Weakley was filed on 02/14/2020. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 02/18/2020 02:15 PM]
February 14, 2020 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Timothy Weakley on 02/14/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/18/2020 02:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Timothy Weakley v. Attorney General State of Ala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Represented By: John J. Davis
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: TIMOTHY WEAKLEY
Represented By: Timothy Weakley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?