Michael DiBauda v. Thaxton Investment Corporation, et al
| MICHAEL A. DIBAUDA |
| THAXTON INVESTMENT CORPORATION and SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a South Carolina Domestic Corporation |
| 20-10621 |
| February 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Michael A. DiBauda failed to file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/31/2020 09:42 AM] |
ORDER: Motion to file civil appeal statement out of time filed by Appellant Michael A. DiBauda is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9036898-2 ] [Entered: 03/25/2020 01:39 PM]
|
| RESPONSE to Motion filed by Appellant Michael A. DiBauda [ # 9036898-2 ] filed by Attorney Luke Donohue for Appellees Southern Management Corporation and Thaxton Investment Corporation. [20-10621] (ECF: Luke Donohue) [Entered: 03/24/2020 02:04 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 03/18/2020 11:43 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Thomas F. Martin for Appellant Michael A. DiBauda. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10621] (ECF: Thomas Martin) [Entered: 03/17/2020 12:15 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Thomas F. Martin for Appellant Michael A. DiBauda. [20-10621] (ECF: Thomas Martin) [Entered: 03/17/2020 01:45 PM] |
| NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN a motion to file out of time must be filed along with the civil appeal statement Notice of receipt: Civil Appeal Statement as to Appellant Michael A. DiBauda. [Entered: 03/17/2020 03:02 PM] |
| MOTION Permission to FILE CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OUT OF TIME filed by Michael A. DiBauda. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9036898-1] [20-10621] (ECF: Thomas Martin) [Entered: 03/17/2020 04:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas F. Martin for Michael A. DiBauda. [20-10621] (ECF: Thomas Martin) [Entered: 03/17/2020 11:02 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Luke Donohue for Appellees Southern Management Corporation and Thaxton Investment Corporation. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10621] (ECF: Luke Donohue) [Entered: 03/13/2020 04:12 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Luke Donohue for Thaxton Investment Corporation and Southern Management Corporation and Deepa N. Subramanian for Thaxton Investment Corporation and Southern Management Corporation. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/13/2020 11:53 AM] |
| The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Michael A. DiBauda. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 03/10/2020 12:53 PM] |
| Attorney Thomas F. Martin for Appellant Michael A. DiBauda has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 03/06/2020 08:24 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Thomas F. Martin for Michael A. DiBauda. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/28/2020 08:21 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Deepa N. Subramanian for Southern Management Corporation and Thaxton Investment Corporation. [20-10621] (ECF: Deepa Subramanian) [Entered: 02/21/2020 05:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Luke Donohue for Southern Management Corporation and Thaxton Investment Corporation. [20-10621] (ECF: Luke Donohue) [Entered: 02/21/2020 05:58 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 02/13/2020 as to Appellant Michael A. DiBauda. [Entered: 02/20/2020 09:41 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael A. DiBauda on 02/13/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/27/2020 as to Appellant Michael A. DiBauda. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/12/2020 as to Appellee Southern Management Corporation [Entered: 02/20/2020 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
