Herman Ingram v. James Deal
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES DEAL
Petitioner / Appellant: HERMAN INGRAM
Case Number: 20-11396
Filed: April 13, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2020 Public Communication: Appellant inquiry and deputy clerk's reply [Entered: 06/03/2020 11:28 AM]
May 27, 2020 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Herman Ingram. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9096474-1] [Entered: 05/27/2020 09:23 AM]
May 20, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement to accompany IFP motion filed by Appellant Herman Ingram. [Entered: 05/21/2020 02:36 PM]
May 11, 2020 Notice of filing Prisoner Financial Statement as to appellant. [Entered: 05/13/2020 12:34 PM]
May 8, 2020 Notice of receipt: Letter stating that financial statement has been requested as to Appellant Herman Ingram. [Entered: 05/11/2020 02:25 PM]
May 5, 2020 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-11396] (ECF: Paula Smith) [Entered: 05/05/2020 10:52 AM]
April 30, 2020 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Herman Ingram was filed on 04/14/2020. Docket Entry 30. [Entered: 04/30/2020 02:19 PM]
April 29, 2020 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Herman Ingram. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9075160-1] [Entered: 04/30/2020 02:23 PM]
April 24, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Herman Ingram. [Entered: 04/27/2020 03:23 PM]
April 21, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [20-11396] (ECF: Paula Smith) [Entered: 04/21/2020 10:09 AM]
April 15, 2020 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Herman Ingram was filed on 03/27/2020. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 04/15/2020 07:30 AM]
April 15, 2020 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Herman Ingram was filed on 04/13/2020. Docket Entry 29. [Entered: 04/15/2020 07:31 AM]
April 15, 2020 Notice of receipt: Inquiry as to Appellant Herman Ingram. No reply sent, as the appeal had not been opened when this letter was sent by appellant. [Entered: 04/16/2020 03:17 PM]
April 13, 2020 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Herman Ingram on 04/09/2020 04/13/2020. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/15/2020 07:26 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Herman Ingram v. James Deal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JAMES DEAL
Represented By: Jason Matthew Rea
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Represented By: Paula Khristian Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: HERMAN INGRAM
Represented By: Herman Ingram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?