Karen Stripling v. Freddie McKinney, et al
| KAREN STRIPLING |
| LOU ROBERTS, Sheriff, FREDDIE MCKINNEY and JAMES GOODMAN, Judge |
| 20-11634 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Notice of receipt: Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to Appellant Karen Stripling. [Entered: 10/07/2020 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN This case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and all pending motions denied as moot Notice of receipt: Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as to Appellant Karen Stripling. [Entered: 07/22/2020 10:12 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT by Appellant Karen Stripling. (See Order for complete text) [ # 3 ] JP, BCG and RJL [Entered: 07/13/2020 01:34 PM]
|
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Karen Stripling. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9091432-1] [Entered: 05/19/2020 05:20 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Karen Stripling. [Entered: 05/19/2020 05:25 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Karen Stripling was filed on 04/29/2020. Docket Entry 8. [Entered: 05/01/2020 11:51 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Karen Stripling on 03/16/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/03/2020 as to Appellant Karen Stripling [Entered: 05/01/2020 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.