Karen Stripling v. Jackson County Sheriff's, et al
COMPAQ COMPUTER, TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, HEWLITT PACKARD and JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE |
KAREN STRIPLING |
20-11653 |
April 29, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Karen Stripling. [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:03 AM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Karen Stripling. [Entered: 05/19/2020 04:30 PM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Karen Stripling. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9091374-1] [Entered: 05/19/2020 04:28 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Karen Stripling. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/14/2020 12:19 PM] |
USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Karen Stripling was filed on 04/29/2020. Docket Entry 7. [Entered: 05/04/2020 09:03 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Karen Stripling on 03/27/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/13/2020 as to Appellant Karen Stripling [Entered: 05/04/2020 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.