Hamza Maldonado, et al v. Baker County Sheriff's Office, et al
| BAKER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JAMES MESSER, SCOTTY RHODEN and EVELYN BLUE, Captain |
| HAMZA MALDONADO and JAMES HILL |
| 20-11715 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Returned Mail was received for Party Hamza Maldonado. Address has not been verified and updated, . IN RE: May 20, 2020 CIP Deficiency Letter [Entered: 06/05/2020 01:44 PM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant James Hill failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/28/2020 04:20 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Hamza Maldonado. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/20/2020 08:28 AM] |
| Returned Mail was received for Party Hamza Maldonado. Forwarding address not available. IN RE: May 18, 2020 DKT-2 Letter [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:04 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellants James Hill and Hamza Maldonado on 05/01/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/07/2020 12:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
