Peter Sporea v. Regions Bank, N.A.
REGIONS BANK |
PETER SPOREA |
20-11812 |
May 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Peter Sporea v. Regions Bank, N.A. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellate fee was paid on 06/17/2020 as to Appellant Peter Sporea. [Entered: 06/17/2020 11:40 AM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Peter Sporea. The appellant's brief is due on or before 07/20/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 06/17/2020 11:48 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Brian Patrick Yates for Appellee Regions Bank. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-11812] (ECF: Brian Yates) [Entered: 06/11/2020 11:55 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Brian Patrick Yates for Regions Bank. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/11/2020 11:37 AM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Peter Sporea. [Entered: 06/11/2020 11:36 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brian Patrick Yates for Regions Bank. [20-11812] (ECF: Brian Yates) [Entered: 06/04/2020 09:28 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Peter Sporea. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/28/2020 04:17 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Peter Sporea on 05/13/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/27/2020 as to Appellant Peter Sporea. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/10/2020 as to Appellee Regions Bank [Entered: 05/18/2020 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Peter Sporea v. Regions Bank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: REGIONS BANK | |
Represented By: | Brian Patrick Yates |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: PETER SPOREA | |
Represented By: | Peter Sporea |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.