In re: Roderick Myles
Petitioner: In re: RODERICK BERNARD MYLES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 20-11827
Filed: May 14, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Scott Gray for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama for USA. [20-11827] (ECF: Scott Gray) [Entered: 05/18/2020 03:45 PM]
May 14, 2020 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive motion to vacate sentence filed by Petitioner Roderick Bernard Myles. Served 05/08/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 05/18/2020 03:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Roderick Myles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama
Represented By: Scott Alan Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: RODERICK BERNARD MYLES
Represented By: Roderick Bernard Myles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?