Kalyn Stephens v. Atlanta Housing Authority, et al
| MORGAN JOHNSON, CYNTHIA MCDONALD, BRANDON RIDDICK-SEALS, ATLANTA HOUSING AUTHORITY, GEORGIA and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS |
| KALYN STEPHENS |
| 20-11866 |
| May 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction (see attached order for complete text). BBM, RSR and JP [Entered: 07/08/2020 09:01 AM]
|
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Kalyn Stephens. [Entered: 06/17/2020 03:48 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Kalyn Stephens. [Entered: 06/03/2020 12:24 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Kalyn Stephens. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/28/2020 04:14 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kalyn Stephens on 05/11/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/26/2020 as to Appellant Kalyn Stephens [Entered: 05/21/2020 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
