Raymond Smith v. Forest River, Inc.
RAYMOND KENDALL SMITH |
FOREST RIVER, INC. |
20-12009 |
June 1, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Raymond Kendall Smith. [Entered: 07/29/2020 01:46 PM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith. The appellant's brief is due on or before 08/12/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 07/09/2020 10:46 AM] |
TRANSCRIPTS FILED. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Bonnie J. Lewis, Filer: Raymond K. Smith, Dt. all Trans. Filed: 07/03/2020, Proceeding Type and Date: Status Conference 01/09/2020. [Entered: 07/08/2020 08:30 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Amanda Rumker and John Glenn for Forest River, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12009] (ECF: Amanda Rumker) [Entered: 06/26/2020 12:11 PM] |
Court Reporter acknowledgment not filed. Letter issued to Court Reporter Unknown Reporter as to Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith. Transcript is due to be filed in District Court 30 days from 06/05/2020. [Entered: 06/24/2020 10:56 AM] |
Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 06/18/2020 01:52 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by John J. Glenn for Forest River, Inc.. [20-12009] (ECF: John Glenn) [Entered: 06/16/2020 02:40 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Amanda N. Rumker, Esquire - Counsel for Forest River, Inc. Amanda Rumker for Forest River, Inc.. [20-12009] (ECF: Amanda Rumker) [Entered: 06/16/2020 10:20 AM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Karen Coolman Amlong for Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith. [20-12009] (ECF: Karen Amlong) [Entered: 06/15/2020 03:51 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Karen Coolman Amlong for Raymond Kendall Smith. [20-12009] (ECF: Karen Amlong) [Entered: 06/05/2020 04:31 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Karen Coolman Amlong for Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12009] (ECF: Karen Amlong) [Entered: 06/05/2020 04:33 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Karen Coolman Amlong for Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith. Transcript(s) ordered. [20-12009] (ECF: Karen Amlong) [Entered: 06/05/2020 04:37 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM PROCESSED. Transcript Order: Filer: Raymond K. Smith, Court Reporter: Unknown Reporter, Proceeding Type and Date: Status Conference 01/09/2020. [Entered: 06/05/2020 10:45 PM] |
Appellate fee was paid on 05/29/2020 as to Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith. [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:05 PM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith on 05/29/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/15/2020 as to Appellant Raymond Kendall Smith. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/29/2020 as to Appellee Forest River, Inc. [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.