Marcus Terrell v. Warden, et al
| HALL, MARCUS, WILLIAMS, WARDEN and WHITE |
| MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL |
| 20-12285 |
| June 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of receipt:of letter from appellant requesting stay as to Appellant Marcus Anthony Terrell. [Entered: 08/03/2020 01:33 PM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Marcus Anthony Terrell failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 07/21/2020 09:27 AM] |
| Notice of Change of Address for Party Marcus Anthony Terrell, from Augusta State SMP to Johnson SP. [Entered: 07/17/2020 07:27 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Marcus Anthony Terrell. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/03/2020 08:12 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Marcus Anthony Terrell on 06/16/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 06/25/2020 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
