Ahquan Boyd v. Benjamin Ford
| BENJAMIN FORD |
| AHQUAN DANTE BOYD |
| 20-12299 |
| June 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.; Motion filed by Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd is DENIED as MOOT. [ # 9137903-2 ]; Motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd is DENIED as MOOT. (see attached order for complete text) [ # 9137811-2 ] RSR, RJL and ALB [Entered: 08/04/2020 03:06 PM]
|
| Notice of receipt: Letter from Appellant as to Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd. [Entered: 07/22/2020 01:56 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd was filed on 04/06/2020. Docket Entry 56. [Entered: 07/15/2020 02:57 PM] |
| MOTION Motion for Correction Hearing and/or modification of the Record in a hearing. filed by Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9137903-1] [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:46 PM] |
| NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Notice of receipt: Sworn Affifavit of Truth as to Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd. [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:39 PM] |
| MOTION to consolidate appeals 19-14258 filed by Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9137811-1] [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:14 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd. [Entered: 07/15/2020 03:03 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Ahquan Dante Boyd. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/07/2020 03:55 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12299] (ECF: Clint Malcolm) [Entered: 06/25/2020 07:55 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [20-12299] (ECF: Clint Malcolm) [Entered: 06/24/2020 03:55 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ahquan Dante Boyd on 06/19/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 06/24/2020 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ahquan Boyd v. Benjamin Ford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: BENJAMIN FORD | |
| Represented By: | Paula Khristian Smith |
| Represented By: | Clint Christopher Malcolm |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: AHQUAN DANTE BOYD | |
| Represented By: | Ahquan Dante Boyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
