William Mitchell v. Autry State Prison, et al
| WILLIAM GEORGE MITCHELL |
| HODGE, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SALES, AUTRY STATE PRISON and WARDEN |
| 20-12492 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.; Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant William George Mitchell is DENIED as MOOT (see attached order for complete text). [ # 9154839-2 ] ELB, BCG and RJL [Entered: 08/13/2020 12:22 PM]
|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant William George Mitchell. [Entered: 08/07/2020 02:46 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant William George Mitchell. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9154839-1] [Entered: 08/05/2020 07:20 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to William George Mitchell. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 07/16/2020 07:50 AM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant William George Mitchell on 07/01/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 07/07/2020 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
