Miguel Barrera Ramirez v. U.S. Attorney General
| MIGUEL BARRERA RAMIREZ |
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 20-12507 |
| July 6, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Miguel Barrera Ramirez is DENIED (see attached order for complete text). [ # 9131763-2 ] CRW, RSR and KCN [Entered: 07/10/2020 08:38 AM]
|
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Craig William Kuhn for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12507] (ECF: Craig Kuhn) [Entered: 07/09/2020 10:24 AM] |
| RESPONSE to Motion filed by Petitioner Miguel Barrera Ramirez [ # 9131763-2 ] filed by Attorney Craig William Kuhn for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. [20-12507] (ECF: Craig Kuhn) [Entered: 07/09/2020 11:20 AM] |
| AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Craig William Kuhn for Respondent U.S. Attorney General. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12507] (ECF: Craig Kuhn) [Entered: 07/09/2020 12:06 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: Immigration judge order as to Petitioner Miguel Barrera Ramirez. [Entered: 07/09/2020 08:37 AM] |
| DHS letter from Petitioner Miguel Barrera Ramirez stating DHS advised petitioner is detained and is scheduled for removal not prior to July 11, 2020.. [Entered: 07/08/2020 05:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Craig William Kuhn for U.S. Attorney General. [20-12507] (ECF: Craig Kuhn) [Entered: 07/08/2020 04:28 PM] |
| MOTION for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Miguel Barrera Ramirez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9131763-1] [Entered: 07/08/2020 02:28 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Miguel Barrera Ramirez. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9131765-1] [Entered: 07/08/2020 02:29 PM] |
| AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioner Miguel Barrera Ramirez. Additional Documents Needed: Immigration Judge Order. Fee Status: IFP Pending. 07/08/2020. [Entered: 07/08/2020 02:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Miguel Barrera Ramirez v. U.S. Attorney General | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MIGUEL BARRERA RAMIREZ | |
| Represented By: | Miguel Barrera Ramirez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Craig William Kuhn |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Alfie Owens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
