Steven Thomason v. State of Alabama Home Builders
Respondent / Appellee: STATE OF ALABAMA HOME BUILDERS LICENSURE BOARD
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVEN THOMASON
Case Number: 20-12685
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 13, 2021 Steven Clayton Thomason v. Attorney General, State of Alabama

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2020 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Steven Thomason was filed on 08/26/2020. Docket Entry 45. [Entered: 08/27/2020 02:04 PM]
August 13, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Steven Thomason. [Entered: 08/19/2020 08:28 AM]
August 7, 2020 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Kristi Oggs Wilkerson for Appellee State of Alabama Home Builders Licensure Board. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12685] (ECF: Kristi Wilkerson) [Entered: 08/07/2020 09:47 AM]
August 5, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Steven Marshall for State of Alabama Home Builders Licensure Board and Kristi Oggs Wilkerson for State of Alabama Home Builders Licensure Board. [20-12685] (ECF: Kristi Wilkerson) [Entered: 08/05/2020 12:12 PM]
August 3, 2020 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Steven Thomason. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/03/2020 10:22 AM]
July 27, 2020 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Steven Thomason. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 07/30/2020 08:40 AM]
July 27, 2020 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Steven Thomason. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9149935-1] [Entered: 07/30/2020 08:50 AM]
July 17, 2020 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Steven Thomason was filed on 07/16/2020. Docket Entry 39. [Entered: 07/23/2020 08:12 AM]
July 17, 2020 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Steven Thomason on 07/15/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 07/23/2020 08:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Steven Thomason v. State of Alabama Home Builders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STATE OF ALABAMA HOME BUILDERS LICENSURE BOARD
Represented By: Kristi Oggs Wilkerson
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: STEVEN THOMASON
Represented By: Steven Thomason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?