Peter Davis v. Tony Gregory, et al
PETER DAVIS |
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Y. WILLIAMS, J. ACOSTA, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, BROWARD SHERIFF'S OFFICE and TONY GREGORY |
20-12716 |
July 22, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Peter Davis v. Sheriff Tony Gregory, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Peter Davis. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/26/2020. [Entered: 09/17/2020 04:07 PM] |
Consent Form filed by Appellant Peter Davis. [Entered: 09/17/2020 03:31 PM] |
Notice of receipt: Notice of order granting motion in USDC as to Appellant Peter Davis. No action required. [Entered: 08/26/2020 10:19 AM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Peter Davis. [Entered: 08/26/2020 10:19 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Peter Davis. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/12/2020 12:10 PM] |
USDC Order Granting appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 07/30/2020. Docket Entry 32. [Entered: 08/12/2020 12:13 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Peter Davis on 07/21/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 07/24/2020 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.