Joshua Hardin v. Doctor Cruz, et al
JOHN ZAK, MYERS and CRUZ |
JOSHUA NEEL HARDIN |
20-12920 |
August 5, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin. [Entered: 09/28/2020 09:50 AM] |
Notice of receipt: Motion requesting extension of time with IFP as to Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN This case is closed and a Motion to Reinstate has not been received. [Entered: 09/02/2020 06:42 PM] |
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/27/2020 02:58 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Joshua Neel Hardin. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/25/2020 08:44 AM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin on 08/03/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid USDC motion Pending: Motion to Withdraw as attorney for Appellees, DE# 73 08/06/2020. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/07/2020 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.