Joshua Hardin v. Doctor Cruz, et al
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN ZAK, MYERS and CRUZ
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSHUA NEEL HARDIN
Case Number: 20-12920
Filed: August 5, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin. [Entered: 09/28/2020 09:50 AM]
August 31, 2020 Notice of receipt: Motion requesting extension of time with IFP as to Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN This case is closed and a Motion to Reinstate has not been received. [Entered: 09/02/2020 06:42 PM]
August 27, 2020 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 08/27/2020 02:58 PM]
August 25, 2020 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Joshua Neel Hardin. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/25/2020 08:44 AM]
August 5, 2020 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Joshua Neel Hardin on 08/03/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid USDC motion Pending: Motion to Withdraw as attorney for Appellees, DE# 73 08/06/2020. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/07/2020 02:49 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joshua Hardin v. Doctor Cruz, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN ZAK
Represented By: Daniel Sidney Liebowitz
Represented By: Molly J. Durso
Represented By: Ana C. Dolney Francolin
Represented By: Brett A. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MYERS
Represented By: Daniel Sidney Liebowitz
Represented By: Molly J. Durso
Represented By: Ana C. Dolney Francolin
Represented By: Brett A. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CRUZ
Represented By: Daniel Sidney Liebowitz
Represented By: Molly J. Durso
Represented By: Ana C. Dolney Francolin
Represented By: Brett A. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOSHUA NEEL HARDIN
Represented By: Dade CI Warden
Represented By: Joshua Neel Hardin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?