Brad Smith v. USA
| BRAD LAMONT SMITH |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-12981 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Brad Lamont Smith was filed on 08/27/2020. Docket Entry 22. [Entered: 09/22/2020 12:13 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Brad Lamont Smith. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/14/2020 08:40 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Brad Lamont Smith. [Entered: 09/22/2020 12:15 PM] |
| Amended MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Brad Lamont Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9194078-1] [Entered: 09/22/2020 12:21 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael B. Billingsley for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12981] (ECF: Michael Billingsley) [Entered: 09/02/2020 11:51 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Brad Lamont Smith. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/25/2020 08:59 AM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Brad Lamont Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9173176-1] [Entered: 08/26/2020 04:32 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Brad Lamont Smith was filed on 08/11/2020. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 08/12/2020 09:55 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Billingsley for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama for USA. [20-12981] (ECF: Michael Billingsley) [Entered: 08/12/2020 04:46 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Brad Lamont Smith on 08/05/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/12/2020 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Brad Smith v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: BRAD LAMONT SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Brad Lamont Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Alabama |
| Represented By: | Michael B. Billingsley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
