Stephen O'Neill v. Cotton Holdings, Inc., et al
| STEPHEN O'NEILL |
| COTTON HOLDINGS, INC. and COTTON COMMERCIAL USA, INC. (TX) |
| 20-12999 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Appellant Stephen O'Neill's motion for voluntary dismissal, FRAP Rule 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date [Entered: 09/23/2020 08:52 AM] |
ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Stephen O'Neill is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9193193-2 ] [Entered: 09/23/2020 08:51 AM]
|
| MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Stephen O'Neill. Joint Stipulation of Parties. [9193193-1] [20-12999] (ECF: Larry Pankey) [Entered: 09/21/2020 03:34 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Stephen O'Neill and Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. (TX) and Cotton Holdings, Inc.. [Entered: 09/09/2020 11:15 AM] |
| Response to Civil Appeal Statement form filed by Attorney Eric Russell Magnus for Appellees Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. (TX) and Cotton Holdings, Inc.. [20-12999] (ECF: Eric Magnus) [Entered: 08/31/2020 02:46 PM] |
| Appearance of counsel form has not been processed. According to our records, Larry Allen Pankey for Stephen O'Neill is not a member of the Eleventh Circuit bar. The appearance of counsel form has not been processed allowing fourteen days to complete and submit the required application for admission. [Entered: 08/21/2020 08:05 AM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Larry Allen Pankey for Appellant Stephen O'Neill. [20-12999] (ECF: Larry Pankey) [Entered: 08/20/2020 05:35 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12999] (ECF: Larry Pankey) [Entered: 08/20/2020 05:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Larry Allen Pankey for Stephen O'Neill. [20-12999] (ECF: Larry Pankey) [Entered: 08/20/2020 05:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Eric Russell Magnus for Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. (TX) and Cotton Holdings, Inc.. [20-12999] (ECF: Eric Magnus) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:08 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Mary Claire Smith for Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. (TX) and Cotton Holdings, Inc.. [20-12999] (ECF: Eric Magnus) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-12999] (ECF: Eric Magnus) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:15 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 08/10/2020 as to Appellant Stephen O'Neill. [Entered: 08/11/2020 02:47 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Stephen O'Neill on 08/10/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/21/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/24/2020 as to Appellant Stephen O'Neill. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/08/2020 as to Appellee Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. (TX) [Entered: 08/11/2020 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
