Curtis Floyd v. Tiffiny Manuel, et al
| PATSY ROBERTS, BRUCE WRIGHT, KEITH MELTON, ERIC WHITLOW, JACOB RHEIN and TIFFINY MANUEL |
| CURTIS FLOYD |
| 20-13066 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Curtis Floyd. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/23/2020 08:22 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Curtis Floyd. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/02/2020 05:52 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Curtis Floyd was filed on 08/17/2020. Docket Entry 12. [Entered: 08/19/2020 10:25 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Curtis Floyd on 08/11/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/31/2020 as to Appellant Curtis Floyd [Entered: 08/19/2020 10:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
