Tony Smith v. Leon Bolling
LEON BOLLING |
TONY LEE SMITH |
20-13199 |
August 26, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tony Lee Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9207255-1] [Entered: 10/07/2020 04:09 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Tony Lee Smith. [Entered: 09/30/2020 03:02 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Tony Lee Smith. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/25/2020 04:44 PM] |
Notice of Change of Address for Party Tony Lee Smith. [Entered: 09/25/2020 04:02 PM] |
Amended Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 9189745-2 ] filed by Appellant Tony Lee Smith. [Entered: 09/22/2020 01:17 PM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Tony Lee Smith. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9189745-1] [Entered: 09/16/2020 04:17 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Kevin Blackburn for Appellee Leon Bolling. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13199] (ECF: Kevin Blackburn) [Entered: 09/14/2020 12:53 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Tony Lee Smith. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/10/2020 10:36 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kevin Blackburn for Leon Bolling. [20-13199] (ECF: Kevin Blackburn) [Entered: 09/10/2020 10:08 AM] |
USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Tony Lee Smith was filed on 08/31/2020. Docket Entry 35. [Entered: 09/02/2020 12:21 PM] |
USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Tony Lee Smith was filed on 07/28/2020. Docket Entry 29. [Entered: 08/27/2020 03:49 PM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tony Lee Smith on 08/26/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/27/2020 03:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Tony Smith v. Leon Bolling | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: LEON BOLLING | |
Represented By: | Kevin Blackburn |
Represented By: | Morgan Booker Beckman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: TONY LEE SMITH | |
Represented By: | Tony Lee Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.