Freddie Wilson v. Ally Financial
| ALLY FINANCIAL |
| FREDDIE WILSON |
| 20-13250 |
| August 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Freddie Wilson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of documents without action, or other sanctions. [Entered: 09/29/2020 09:11 AM] |
| USDC order, construed as denying IFP as to Appellant Freddie Wilson, was filed on 08/31/2020. Docket Entry 55. [Entered: 09/25/2020 08:35 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Ethan G. Ostroff for ALFI. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/25/2020 08:22 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Ethan G. Ostroff for Ally Financial Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13250] (ECF: Ethan Ostroff) [Entered: 09/23/2020 06:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ethan G. Ostroff for Ally Financial Inc. [20-13250] (ECF: Ethan Ostroff) [Entered: 09/23/2020 06:29 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Freddie Wilson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of documents without action, or other sanctions. [Entered: 09/14/2020 12:47 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Freddie Wilson on 08/26/2020. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/06/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/10/2020 as to Appellant Freddie Wilson. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/24/2020 as to Appellee Ally Financial [Entered: 08/31/2020 03:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Freddie Wilson v. Ally Financial | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ALLY FINANCIAL | |
| Represented By: | Keaton C. Stoneking |
| Represented By: | Gillian D. Williston |
| Represented By: | Ethan G. Ostroff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: FREDDIE WILSON | |
| Represented By: | Freddie Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
