Kenneth Pollak v. Secretary, Florida Department
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
KENNETH M. POLLAK |
20-13466 |
September 15, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for extension of time of 30 days to file motion for COA filed by Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9230328-2 ] to 12/16/2020. [Entered: 11/09/2020 09:35 AM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9230319-1] [Entered: 11/04/2020 03:53 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time of 30 days to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9230328-1] [Entered: 11/04/2020 03:55 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak. [Entered: 10/16/2020 09:46 AM] |
USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak was filed on 10/09/2020. Docket Entry 49. [Entered: 10/13/2020 02:29 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Heidi Lynn Bettendorf for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13466] (ECF: Heidi Bettendorf) [Entered: 10/07/2020 04:00 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Kenneth M. Pollak. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/06/2020 12:44 PM] |
Notice of receipt: motion for extension of time to file motion for a COA as to Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak. No action to be taken because COA is not yet due. [Entered: 10/01/2020 02:01 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Heidi L. Bettendorf for Secretary, DOC Ashley Moody for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. [20-13466] (ECF: Heidi Bettendorf) [Entered: 09/23/2020 10:42 AM] |
USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak was filed on 08/28/2020. Docket Entry 43. [Entered: 09/17/2020 10:06 AM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Kenneth M. Pollak on 09/15/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/17/2020 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Kenneth Pollak v. Secretary, Florida Department | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
Represented By: | Ashley Moody |
Represented By: | Heidi Lynn Bettendorf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: KENNETH M. POLLAK | |
Represented By: | Kenneth M. Pollak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.