Henry Garcia-Morataya, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
| HENRY ELIZALDO GARCIA-MORATAYA, N. A. G.-T. and Y. E. G.-T. |
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 20-13486 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Henry Elizaldo Garcia-Morataya, et al v. U.S. Attorney General |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Removed from case: Attorney Alfie Owens for Respondent U.S. Attorney General in 20-13486. [Entered: 09/24/2020 08:30 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Brooke Maurer. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13486] (ECF: Brooke Maurer) [Entered: 09/18/2020 04:01 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brooke Maurer OIL for U.S. Attorney General. [20-13486] (ECF: Brooke Maurer) [Entered: 09/18/2020 03:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Attorney Ellis D. Bingham III for Petitioner Henry Elizaldo Garcia-Morataya in 20-13486, Attorney Ellis D. Bingham III for Petitioner Y. E. G.-T. in 20-13486, Attorney Ellis D. Bingham III for Petitioner N. A. G.-T. in 20-13486. [Entered: 09/18/2020 12:23 PM] |
| AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioners N. A. G.-T., Y. E. G.-T. and Henry Elizaldo Garcia-Morataya. Additional Documents Needed: Notice to appear. Fee Status: Fee Paid. 09/15/2020. [Entered: 09/18/2020 12:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
