Frederick Thompson v. Eaton Corporation
EATON CORPORATION |
FREDERICK D. THOMAS and FREDERICK D. THOMPSON |
20-13517 |
September 17, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for extension to file appellant brief filed by Appellant Frederick D. Thompson is GRANTED. [ # 9220388-2 ] Appellants brief is due on 11/30/2020, with the appendix due (7) days thereafter. BCG [Entered: 10/29/2020 03:32 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 11/27/2020 filed by Frederick D. Thompson. Motion is Unopposed. [9220388-1] [20-13517] (ECF: Jason Coffman) [Entered: 10/23/2020 01:31 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Tracie J. Maurer for ETN. [20-13517] (ECF: Tracie Maurer) [Entered: 10/22/2020 07:31 PM] |
Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 10/21/2020 05:59 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Jason H. Coffman for Appellant Frederick D. Thomas. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 10/08/2020 08:11 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Jason H. Coffman for Appellant Frederick D. Thomas. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [20-13517] (ECF: Jason Coffman) [Entered: 10/07/2020 02:10 PM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Jason H. Coffman for Appellant Frederick D. Thomas. [20-13517] (ECF: Jason Coffman) [Entered: 10/07/2020 02:00 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jason H. Coffman for Frederick Thompson Jason H. Coffman for Frederick D. Thomas. [20-13517] (ECF: Jason Coffman) [Entered: 10/07/2020 01:35 PM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Tracie J. Maurer for Appellee ETN. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13517] (ECF: Tracie Maurer) [Entered: 10/06/2020 05:54 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Jason H. Coffman for Frederick D. Thomas. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/02/2020 11:25 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13517] (ECF: Jason Coffman) [Entered: 10/02/2020 11:49 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Frederick D. Thomas on 09/17/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/27/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/01/2020 as to Appellant Frederick D. Thomas. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/15/2020 as to Appellee Eaton Corporation [Entered: 09/23/2020 10:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.