Jessica Rogers v. John Gaddis, et al
| MICHELLE BAUMAN, in her official and individual capacity and JOHN GADDIS, in his official and inividual capacity |
| JESSICA N. ROGERS, as personal representative of the estate of Jose F. Escano-Reyes and as parent and natural guardian of Y C A minor child |
| 20-13562 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jessica N. Rogers v. John Gaddis, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellants Michelle Bauman and John Gaddis. [Entered: 11/20/2020 11:19 AM] |
| Appellant's brief filed by Michelle Bauman and John Gaddis. [20-13562] (ECF: Thomas Poulton) [Entered: 11/16/2020 10:20 AM] |
| ***Docketing Error***APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bradford Rothwell Sohn for Jessica N. Rogers. [20-13562]--[Edited 10/28/2020 by JC] (ECF: Bradford Sohn) [Entered: 10/28/2020 02:21 PM] |
| Notice of deficient Appearance of Counsel filed by Bradford Rothwell Sohn for Jessica N. Rogers. Document not correctly uploaded (sideways). Counsel must file a corrected Appearance of Counsel form. [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:45 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bradford Rothwell Sohn for Jessica N. Rogers. [20-13562] (ECF: Bradford Sohn) [Entered: 10/28/2020 05:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Erik W. Scharf for Jessica Rogers [20-13562] (ECF: Erik Scharf) [Entered: 10/21/2020 05:12 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 10/21/2020 12:52 PM] |
| 14-day Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney Thomas W. Poulton for Appellants John Gaddis and Michelle Bauman. Appellants brief due on 11/16/2020 as to Appellants Michelle Bauman and John Gaddis. Appendix due on 11/23/2020 as to Appellant Michelle Bauman and Party John Gaddis. [Entered: 10/06/2020 09:08 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Thomas W. Poulton for Appellants Michelle Bauman and John Gaddis. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13562] (ECF: Thomas Poulton) [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:55 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Thomas W. Poulton for Appellants Michelle Bauman and John Gaddis. [20-13562] (ECF: Thomas Poulton) [Entered: 10/05/2020 03:48 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas W. Poulton for John Gaddis and Michelle Bauman [20-13562] (ECF: Thomas Poulton) [Entered: 10/01/2020 03:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Timothy Michael Warner for Michelle Bauman and John Gaddis. [20-13562] (ECF: Timothy Warner) [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:48 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Timothy Michael Warner for Appellants Michelle Bauman and John Gaddis. No hearings. [20-13562] (ECF: Timothy Warner) [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:51 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michelle Bauman on 09/21/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/02/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/06/2020 as to Appellant Michelle Bauman. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/20/2020 as to Appellee Jessica N. Rogers [Entered: 09/24/2020 12:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jessica Rogers v. John Gaddis, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MICHELLE BAUMAN, in her official and individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | Alicia D. Carothers |
| Represented By: | Timothy Michael Warner |
| Represented By: | William Gerard Warner |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Poulton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: JOHN GADDIS, in his official and inividual capacity | |
| Represented By: | Alicia D. Carothers |
| Represented By: | Timothy Michael Warner |
| Represented By: | William Gerard Warner |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Poulton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: JESSICA N. ROGERS, as personal representative of the estate of Jose F. Escano-Reyes and as parent and natural guardian of Y C A minor child | |
| Represented By: | David Henry Pollack |
| Represented By: | Bradford Rothwell Sohn |
| Represented By: | Erik W. Scharf |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
