Michael Minton v. Escambia County, et al
| MICHAEL WALTER MINTON |
| DAVID MORGAN, Escambia County Sheriff, S. GULLY, Nurse, ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSSIONERS, ESCAMBIA COUNTY and A. BURGESS, Nurse Practitioner |
| 20-13762 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Michael Walter Minton. [Entered: 11/30/2020 06:21 PM] |
| MOTION Letter construed as Motion Challenging Three-Strikes Status filed by Appellant Michael Walter Minton. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9236273-1] [Entered: 11/13/2020 07:50 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Michael Walter Minton. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/05/2020 04:14 PM] |
| Letter received from Appellant Michael Walter Minton in appeal designated as 3 strikes. [Entered: 11/05/2020 04:13 PM] |
| Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant concerning 3 strikes status. [Entered: 11/05/2020 04:12 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Walter Minton on 10/05/2020. Fee Status: PLRA 3 Strikes. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/13/2020 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
