Frankie Rogers v. City of Stuart Police Dept., et al
FRANKIE LEE ROGERS |
M. DACEY, M. DAY and CITY OF STUART POLICE DEPARTMENT |
20-13905 |
October 16, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Frankie Lee Rogers failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 11/24/2020 10:56 AM] |
NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because an entry of dismissal was entered in this case. Notice of receipt: Request for appointment of counsel as to Appellant Frankie Lee Rogers. [Entered: 12/03/2020 04:48 PM] |
Returned Mail was received for Attorney Anthony Richard Gonzales for Appellee M. Dacey. Address unable to mverif, return to sender, not at this... IN RE: DKT-2 Appeal with Deficiency. [Entered: 11/24/2020 10:50 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Frankie Lee Rogers. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/09/2020 01:37 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Frankie Lee Rogers on 10/16/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 10/22/2020 01:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.