The People of the State of Cal v. Abanoob Abdel-Malak
| THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET. AL. |
| ABANOOB ABDEL-MALAK |
| 20-14013 |
| October 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TIME SENSITIVE MOTION to clarification, for reconsideration of clerk's order, to request or set oral argument.sets oral argument, to expedite ruling on a motion filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9249153-1] [20-14013] (ECF: Abanoob Abdel-Malak) [Entered: 12/01/2020 12:29 PM] |
ORDER: Motion for injunction pending appeal filed by Appellant Abanoob Abdel-Malak is DENIED. [ # 9246174-2 ] KCN, BCG and RJL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 11/25/2020 01:38 PM]
|
| EMERGENCY MOTION for injunction pending appeal, Protective Restraining Order., to request or set oral argument.sets oral argument, to stay pending appeal, for temporary restraining order filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9246174-1] [20-14013] (ECF: Abanoob Abdel-Malak) [Entered: 11/25/2020 10:27 AM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION for appointment of counsel, for attorney's fees or costs, for extension of time to file attorney's fees to requestDateText(SKIP), for extension of time to file Bill of Costs to 11/24/2020, to expedite filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9245855-1] [20-14013] (ECF: Abanoob Abdel-Malak) [Entered: 11/24/2020 07:45 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak, Petitioner Proceeding In Pro Se. Party Abanoob Abdel-Malak. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-14013] (ECF: Abanoob Abdel-Malak) [Entered: 10/28/2020 03:36 PM] |
| MOTION to consolidate appeals 20-13949-E, and 20-14013 filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9224269-1] [20-14013] (ECF: Abanoob Abdel-Malak) [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:03 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Abanoob Abdel-Malak on 10/21/2020. Fee Status: IFP Granted. USDC motion pending: Motion to appoint counsel DE # 15. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/06/2020 as to Appellant Abanoob Abdel-Malak [Entered: 10/28/2020 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: The People of the State of Cal v. Abanoob Abdel-Malak | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET. AL. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ABANOOB ABDEL-MALAK | |
| Represented By: | Abanoob Abdel-Malak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
