Sherwin Perkins v. Ron Primus, et al
SHERWIN S. PERKINS |
HALL, Director of Nursing, RON PRIMUS, ALEN LUNDY, Director of Nursing, JACKSON, Unit Manager and WARDEN |
20-14548 |
December 1, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the Appellant Sherwin S. Perkins failed to pay the filing and docketing fees (or file a motion in the district court for relief from the obligation to pay in advance the full fee) to the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 01/20/2021 10:45 AM] |
This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion for relief from the obligation to pay in advance is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 12/30/2020 12:08 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Sherwin S. Perkins. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/16/2020 12:22 PM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Sherwin S. Perkins on 12/01/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/07/2020 01:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.