Southern Coal Corporation, et al v. Drummond Coal Sales, Inc.
| JAMES C. JUSTICE, II and SOUTHERN COAL CORPORATION |
| DRUMMOND COAL SALES, INC. |
| 20-14561 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [20-14560, 20-14561] [Entered: 01/07/2021 01:25 PM] |
ORDER: Motion to appear pro hac vice filed by Jon Geoffrey Hogue is GRANTED by clerk. [9274219-2] [20-14560, 20-14561] [Entered: 01/05/2021 11:11 AM]
|
| MOTION to appear pro hac vice filed by Attorney Jon Geoffrey Hogue for Appellees-Cross Appellants Southern Coal Corporation and James C. Justice, II. [9274219-1] [20-14560, 20-14561] [Entered: 01/05/2021 11:08 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Stefan Passantino for James C. Justice, II. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-14561] (ECF: Stefan Passantino) [Entered: 12/18/2020 05:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Stefan Passantino for James C. Justice, II [20-14561] (ECF: Stefan Passantino) [Entered: 12/18/2020 05:06 PM] |
| MULTI-CROSS APPEAL DOCKETED. [Entered: 12/10/2020 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
