Larry Roy v. Kay Ivy, et al
| JEFFERSON DUNN, KAY IVY and WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES |
| ROY LARRY and LARRY ROY |
| 20-14761 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Consent Form filed by Appellant Larry Roy. [Entered: 02/18/2021 10:32 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Larry Roy. [Entered: 02/17/2021 05:29 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal construed from appellants consent form filed by Appellant Larry Roy. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9311934-1] [Entered: 02/18/2021 10:51 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Larry Roy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/05/2021 11:55 AM] |
| USDC FRAP 4 Order as to Appellant Larry Roy was filed on 01/27/2021. Docket Entry 65. [Entered: 02/04/2021 10:00 AM] |
| Notice of receipt as to Appellant's IFP Declaration as to Appellant Larry Roy. [Entered: 02/04/2021 10:20 AM] |
| This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a consent form has been filed in this Court. [Entered: 02/02/2021 05:43 PM] |
| Jurisdiction: FRAP 4 motion pending in district court as to Appellant Larry Roy DE #: 57 [Entered: 01/22/2021 10:49 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Larry Roy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/21/2021 10:33 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Larry Roy. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/06/2021 10:42 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Philip Guy Piggott for Appellees Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivy and Wexford Medical Services. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [20-14761] (ECF: Philip Piggott) [Entered: 01/06/2021 01:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Philip Guy Piggott for Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivy and Wexford Medical Services. [20-14761] (ECF: Philip Piggott) [Entered: 01/06/2021 01:43 PM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 12/23/2020. Docket Entry 63. [Entered: 12/28/2020 12:13 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Roy Larry on 12/16/2020. Fee Status: IFP Pending USDC motion Pending: Motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis 12/16/2020. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/22/2020 02:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
