Tasha Royster v. Larry Robinson, et al
Defendant / Appellee: KELVIN LAWSON, in his official capacity as Chairman Florida A&M University, ELMIRA MANGUM, in her individual capacity, LARRY ROBINSON, in his official capacity as President Florida A&M University and JIMMY MILLER, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: TASHA ROYSTER
Case Number: 20-14877
Filed: December 31, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 3, 2021 Tasha Royster v. Larry Robinson, et al

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ashley Richardson for Appellant Tasha Royster [20-14877] (ECF: Ashley Richardson) [Entered: 02/09/2021 03:59 PM]
January 28, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jeffrey Slanker for Appellees Kelvin Lawson and Larry Robinson. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [20-14877] (ECF: Jeffrey Slanker) [Entered: 01/28/2021 05:32 PM]
January 20, 2021 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 01/20/2021 02:37 PM]
January 14, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Marie A. Mattox for Appellant Tasha Royster. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [20-14877] (ECF: Marie Mattox) [Entered: 01/14/2021 09:42 PM]
January 14, 2021 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Marie A. Mattox for Appellant Tasha Royster. [20-14877] (ECF: Marie Mattox) [Entered: 01/14/2021 09:20 PM]
January 14, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Marie A. Mattox for Tasha Royster. [20-14877] (ECF: Marie Mattox) [Entered: 01/14/2021 09:13 PM]
January 8, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert Sniffen for Kelvin Lawson and Larry Robinson. [20-14877] (ECF: Robert Sniffen) [Entered: 01/08/2021 10:30 AM]
January 6, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffrey D. Slanker, Larry Robinson and Kevin Lawson in their official capacities, and Elmira Magnum in her individual capacity. [20-14877] (ECF: Jeffrey Slanker) [Entered: 01/06/2021 05:59 PM]
December 31, 2020 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Tasha Royster on 12/28/2020. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/09/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/14/2021 as to Appellant Tasha Royster. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/28/2021 as to Appellee Kelvin Lawson [Entered: 01/04/2021 11:59 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tasha Royster v. Larry Robinson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KELVIN LAWSON, in his official capacity as Chairman Florida A&M University
Represented By: Diana K. Shumans
Represented By: Jeffrey Slanker
Represented By: Mitchell Johann Herring
Represented By: Robert Sniffen
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ELMIRA MANGUM, in her individual capacity
Represented By: Diana K. Shumans
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LARRY ROBINSON, in his official capacity as President Florida A&M University
Represented By: Diana K. Shumans
Represented By: Jeffrey Slanker
Represented By: Mitchell Johann Herring
Represented By: Robert Sniffen
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JIMMY MILLER, in his individual capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TASHA ROYSTER
Represented By: Cynthia Ann Myers
Represented By: Marie A. Mattox
Represented By: Adam James Ellis
Represented By: Ashley Nicole Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?