Renasant Bank Inc. v. Landcastle Acquisition Corp.
Petitioner: RENASANT BANK INC.
Respondent: LANDCASTLE ACQUISITION CORP.
Case Number: 20-90013
Filed: June 18, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2020 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Edward Henry Wasmuth, Jr. for Respondent Landcastle Acquisition Corp.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-90013] (ECF: Edward Wasmuth) [Entered: 06/26/2020 09:09 AM]
June 26, 2020 RESPONSE to Petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Renasant Bank Inc. [ # 9116458-2 ] filed by Attorney Edward Henry Wasmuth, Jr. for Respondent Landcastle Acquisition Corp.. [20-90013] (ECF: Edward Wasmuth) [Entered: 06/26/2020 09:28 AM]
June 22, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Edward D. Burch, Jr. for Landcastle Acquisition Corp.. [20-90013] (ECF: Edward Burch) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:31 PM]
June 19, 2020 AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Robert F. Parsley for Renasant Bank Attorney Robert F. Parsley for Petitioner Renasant Bank Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-90013] (ECF: Robert Parsley) [Entered: 06/19/2020 02:01 PM]
June 19, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Paul Kohler for Renasant Bank Inc.. [20-90013] (ECF: Michael Kohler) [Entered: 06/19/2020 12:32 PM]
June 19, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Edward H. Wasmuth, Jr. for Respondent [20-90013] (ECF: Edward Wasmuth) [Entered: 06/19/2020 10:36 AM]
June 19, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Robert F. Parsley for Renasant Bank Robert F. Parsley for Renasant Bank Inc.. [20-90013] (ECF: Robert Parsley) [Entered: 06/19/2020 12:23 PM]
June 18, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner Renasant Bank Inc.. [Entered: 06/19/2020 10:07 AM]
June 18, 2020 MISCELLANEOUS CASE DOCKETED. Petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Renasant Bank Inc.. Served 06/18/2020 email - Attorney for Respondents: Burch, Newman; US mail - Attorney for Respondent: Reed. [Entered: 06/19/2020 10:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Renasant Bank Inc. v. Landcastle Acquisition Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RENASANT BANK INC.
Represented By: Robert F. Parsley
Represented By: Michael Paul Kohler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LANDCASTLE ACQUISITION CORP.
Represented By: David C. Newman
Represented By: Benjamin E. Reed
Represented By: Edward Henry Wasmuth Jr.
Represented By: Edward D. Burch Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?