Rosendo Canales v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, et al
| PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS, LLC, PFJ SOUTHEAST, LLC and JOHN DOE |
| ROSENDO CANALES |
| 21-10063 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Public Communication: The clerk's office has received a motion to reinstate the appeal from attorney Madeline Kahn. No action will be taken on the motion because Madeline Kahn is not an 11th Circuit Bar member. [Entered: 03/04/2021 03:57 PM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Rosendo Canales has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules [ # 9295194-2 ] [Entered: 02/17/2021 11:52 AM] |
| ***Docketing Error-Filed Without Leave of the Court***Appellant's brief filed by Rosendo Canales. Service date: 02/17/2021 [21-10063] Attorney for Appellee: Bailey - email; Attorney for Appellee: Beaton - US mail; Attorney for Appellee: Grozine - US mail; Attorney for Appellee: Root - email.--[Edited 03/04/2021 by JC] [Entered: 02/19/2021 12:20 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss appeal as untimely filed by PFJ Southeast, LLC and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9295194-1] [21-10063] (ECF: Melissa Bailey) [Entered: 01/28/2021 03:13 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Melissa L. Bailey, Attorney for Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and PFJ Southeast LLC Melissa L. Bailey for PFJ Southeast, LLC and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC. [21-10063] (ECF: Melissa Bailey) [Entered: 01/28/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Melissa L. Bailey, Attorney for Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and PFJ Southeast LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10063] (ECF: Melissa Bailey) [Entered: 01/28/2021 11:28 AM] |
| Attorney Madeline J. Kahn for Appellant Rosendo Canales has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement and a motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time have been filed.. [Entered: 01/27/2021 08:30 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Madeline J. Kahn for Rosendo Canales. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/21/2021 11:09 AM] |
| Notice of Appeal filed by Attorney Madeline J. Kahn for Appellant Rosendo Canales is not a member of the 11th circuit bar. [Entered: 01/12/2021 11:13 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Rosendo Canales on 01/05/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/16/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/20/2021 as to Appellant Rosendo Canales. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/03/2021 as to Appellee Pilot Travel Centers, LLC [Entered: 01/12/2021 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
