Christopher Schroeder v. Department of Corrections
| DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| CHRISTOPHER SCHROEDER |
| 21-10213 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Christopher Schroeder v. Department of Corrections |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for extension to file motion for COA filed by Appellant Christopher Schroeder is GRANTED. [ # 9333319-2 ] COA due on 04/14/2021. RJL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 03/17/2021 08:37 AM]
|
| MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 04/14/2021 filed by Christopher Schroeder. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9333319-1] [21-10213] (ECF: Rachael Reese) [Entered: 03/15/2021 05:06 PM] |
| USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Christopher Schroeder was filed on 02/25/2021. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 03/01/2021 10:37 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Department of Corrections. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/23/2021 04:51 PM] |
| USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Christopher Schroeder was filed on 01/22/2021. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 02/04/2021 10:45 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Rachael Elizabeth Reese for Christopher Schroeder. [21-10213] (ECF: Rachael Reese) [Entered: 01/22/2021 09:55 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Rachael Elizabeth Reese for Appellant Christopher Schroeder. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10213] (ECF: Rachael Reese) [Entered: 01/22/2021 09:55 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Christopher Schroeder was filed on 11/20/2020. Docket Entry 11. [Entered: 01/21/2021 05:26 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christopher Schroeder on 01/19/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/21/2021 05:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Christopher Schroeder v. Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Cynthia Richards |
| Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CHRISTOPHER SCHROEDER | |
| Represented By: | Rachael Elizabeth Reese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
