USA v. Dwayne Anderson
DWAYNE HENRI ANDERSON, a.k.a. Dewayne H. Anderson |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
21-10222 |
January 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Justin Davids for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10222] (ECF: Justin Davids) [Entered: 01/27/2021 01:48 PM] |
MOTION to dismiss appeal as untimely filed by USA. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9293864-1] [21-10222] (ECF: Channell Singh) [Entered: 01/27/2021 02:16 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Channell Veena Singh for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia for USA. [21-10222] (ECF: Channell Singh) [Entered: 01/26/2021 03:16 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Justin G. Davids for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Georgia for USA. [21-10222] (ECF: Justin Davids) [Entered: 01/22/2021 01:07 PM] |
Notice of receipt: Request to File Late Notice of Appeal as to Appellant Dwayne Henri Anderson. [Entered: 01/22/2021 11:15 AM] |
CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Dwayne Henri Anderson on 01/20/2021. Fee Status: IFP Granted. Appellant brief due 40 days from 01/21/2021. [Entered: 01/22/2021 10:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.