USA v. Jerome Harris, Jr.
| JEROME HARRIS, JR. |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-10337 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by George Martin for USA U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama for USA. [21-10337] (ECF: George Martin) [Entered: 02/04/2021 12:39 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: *Duplicate* NOA filed by Attorney as to Appellant Jerome Harris, Jr... [Entered: 02/03/2021 02:23 PM] |
| USDC order regarding appellant's attorney as to Appellant Jerome Harris, Jr. was filed on 02/03/2021. Docket Entry 262. [Entered: 02/03/2021 02:18 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Patricia Kemp for Jerome Harris, Jr.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10337] (ECF: Patricia Kemp) [Entered: 02/03/2021 01:20 PM] |
| USDC Motion regarding appellant's attorney as to Appellant Jerome Harris, Jr. was filed on 01/29/2021. Docket Entry 256. [Entered: 02/03/2021 10:07 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Patricia Kemp for Jerome Harris, Jr. [21-10337] (ECF: Patricia Kemp) [Entered: 02/03/2021 12:33 PM] |
| CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jerome Harris, Jr. on 01/29/2021. Fee Status: IFP Granted. [Entered: 02/03/2021 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
