USA v. Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steel
MOORE, INGRAM, JOHNSON & STEELE, LLP |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
21-10341 |
February 2, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
USA v. Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Received paper copies of EAppendix filed by Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. 4 VOLUMES - 2 COPIES [Entered: 03/26/2021 09:42 AM] |
Appendix filed [Volumes I - IV VOLUMES] by Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. [21-10341] (ECF: Kenneth Hall) [Entered: 03/22/2021 06:04 PM] |
Received paper copies of EBrief filed by Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. [Entered: 03/19/2021 08:54 AM] |
Appellant's brief filed by Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. [21-10341] (ECF: Kenneth Hall) [Entered: 03/15/2021 11:52 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Douglas Campbell Rennie for Appellee USA. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10341] (ECF: Douglas Rennie) [Entered: 03/02/2021 04:54 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William R. Johnson for Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. [21-10341] (ECF: Kenneth Hall) [Entered: 02/15/2021 08:45 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Kenneth Hall for Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 02/12/2021 11:08 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Kenneth Hall for Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10341] (ECF: Kenneth Hall) [Entered: 02/12/2021 09:49 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kenneth Hall for Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. [21-10341] (ECF: Kenneth Hall) [Entered: 02/12/2021 09:38 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Kenneth Hall for Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [21-10341] (ECF: Kenneth Hall) [Entered: 02/12/2021 09:44 AM] |
Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Kenneth Hall for Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. [21-10341] (ECF: Kenneth Hall) [Entered: 02/12/2021 09:46 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffrey A. Daxe for Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. [21-10341] (ECF: Jeffrey Daxe) [Entered: 02/10/2021 02:52 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Douglas C. Rennie for the USA [21-10341] (ECF: Douglas Rennie) [Entered: 02/09/2021 11:46 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP on 02/02/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 03/15/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/16/2021 as to Appellant Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, LLP. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/02/2021 as to Appellee United States of America [Entered: 02/04/2021 08:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.