Stacey Humphreys v. Warden GDP
| STACEY IAN HUMPHREYS |
| GDCP WARDEN |
| 21-10387 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to Expand the Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9333713-1] [Entered: 03/16/2021 09:44 AM] |
ORDER: Motion for leave to file a motion to expand certificate of appealability up to 15,475 words filed by Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys is GRANTED. [ # 9331123-2 ] WHP, RSR and KCN (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 03/16/2021 09:32 AM]
|
| Corrected Motion [ # 9331123-2 ] filed by Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys. [21-10387] (ECF: Susan Benton) [Entered: 03/12/2021 12:30 PM] |
| MOTION for excess words/pages filed by Stacey Ian Humphreys. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9331123-1] [21-10387] (ECF: Susan Benton) [Entered: 03/11/2021 05:11 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Clint Christopher Malcolm for Appellee GDCP Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10387] (ECF: Clint Malcolm) [Entered: 02/11/2021 04:04 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Susan Jill Benton for Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [21-10387] (ECF: Susan Benton) [Entered: 02/11/2021 04:57 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Susan Jill Benton for Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 02/11/2021 05:29 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Susan Jill Benton for Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10387] (ECF: Susan Benton) [Entered: 02/11/2021 03:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Sabrina Graham for GDCP Warden. [21-10387] (ECF: Sabrina Graham) [Entered: 02/08/2021 02:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Clint Christopher Malcolm for GDCP Warden. [21-10387] (ECF: Clint Malcolm) [Entered: 02/08/2021 02:25 PM] |
| USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys was filed on 05/30/2018. Docket Entry 6. [Entered: 02/05/2021 05:19 PM] |
| USDC order granting in part and denying in part COA as to Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys was filed on 09/16/2020. Docket Entry 74. [Entered: 02/05/2021 05:17 PM] |
| USDC order Granting appointment of counsel as to Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys was filed on 05/30/2018. Docket Entry 6. The capital habeas unit of the Federal Defender Program, Inc., together with the law firm of Troutman Sanders LLP are hereby APPOINTED to represent Petitioner. [Entered: 02/05/2021 05:22 PM] |
| CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney James David Dantzler, Jr. for Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys. [Entered: 02/05/2021 05:25 PM] |
| CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Lindsey B. Mann for Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys. [Entered: 02/05/2021 05:29 PM] |
| DEATH PENALTY APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Susan Jill Benton,James David Dantzler, Jr, and Lindsey B. Mann for Appellant Stacey Ian Humphreys on 02/04/2021. Fee Status: IFP Granted.--[Edited 02/05/2021 by DLT] [Entered: 02/05/2021 04:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
