Darrell Babcock v. Andrea Olson, et al
| ANDREA L. OLSON, Deputy, Martin County Sheriff's Office in individual capacity, MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, William D. Snyder, Sheriff in individual and official capacities and WAYNE R. TROCAN, Deputy, Martin County Sheriff's Office in individual capacity |
| DARRELL MARK BABCOCK |
| 21-10463 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Darrell Mark Babcock v. Andrea L. Olson, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Darrell Mark Babcock. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/03/2021. [Entered: 03/24/2021 10:52 AM] |
| Consent Form filed by Appellant Darrell Mark Babcock. [Entered: 03/24/2021 10:09 AM] |
| Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant regarding DC Order on Leave to Proceed. [Entered: 03/18/2021 12:14 PM] |
| USDC Order Granting appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 03/04/2021. Docket Entry 17. [Entered: 03/08/2021 10:22 AM] |
| Notice of receipt: Transcript Order form sent from DC re all necessary transcripts on file as to Appellant Darrell Mark Babcock. [Entered: 03/08/2021 10:27 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Darrell Mark Babcock. [Entered: 03/09/2021 01:13 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: Copy of Motion to proceed without prepaying fees or costs filed in DC 3/4/2021 as to Appellant Darrell Mark Babcock. [Entered: 03/09/2021 01:15 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darrell Mark Babcock on 02/12/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 02/17/2021 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Darrell Babcock v. Andrea Olson, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ANDREA L. OLSON, Deputy, Martin County Sheriff's Office in individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, William D. Snyder, Sheriff in individual and official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WAYNE R. TROCAN, Deputy, Martin County Sheriff's Office in individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DARRELL MARK BABCOCK | |
| Represented By: | Darrell Mark Babcock |
| Represented By: | FCI Coleman Medium Warden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
