Vinodh Raghubir v. Taylor CI Warden
| TAYLOR CI WARDEN |
| VINODH RAGHUBIR |
| 21-10489 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of receipt: Argument as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 04/12/2021 05:04 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: Notice of Filing, Motion to Waive Filing Fee & Correspondence to the Clerk as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because the deficiency is not cured.. [Entered: 04/15/2021 01:16 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: Notice of filing, Motion to waive filng fee & correspondence to the clerk &See 1915A& as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. [Entered: 04/12/2021 04:58 PM] |
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Vinodh Raghubir failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/26/2021 03:16 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Vinodh Raghubir and Taylor CI Warden. [Entered: 03/23/2021 10:30 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Vinodh Raghubir. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/11/2021 10:01 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 09/09/2020. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 02/19/2021 09:34 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir on 02/12/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/19/2021 09:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Vinodh Raghubir v. Taylor CI Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: TAYLOR CI WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR | |
| Represented By: | Vinodh Raghubir |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
