John Maya v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| JOHN MAYA |
| 21-10664 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Maya. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9353200-1] [Entered: 04/07/2021 11:17 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Joseph S. Hamrick for John Maya. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/15/2021 09:55 AM] |
| AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Joseph S. Hamrick for Appellant John Maya. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10664] (ECF: Joseph Hamrick) [Entered: 03/15/2021 06:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bonnie J. Parrish, Office of Attorney General, State of Florida Florida Attorney General Service for Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections. [21-10664] (ECF: Bonnie Parrish) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:08 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Bonnie J. Parrish, Office of Attorney General, State of Florida. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10664] (ECF: Bonnie Parrish) [Entered: 03/12/2021 12:21 PM] |
| Appellant's brief filed by John Maya. [21-10664] (ECF: Joseph Hamrick) [Entered: 03/11/2021 05:40 PM] |
ORDER: Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Susanne K. Sichta is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9330670-2 ] Attorney terminated: Attorney Susanne K. Sichta for Appellant John Maya in 21-10664. [Entered: 03/11/2021 02:16 PM]
|
| MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Susanne K. Sichta for Appellant John Maya. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9330670-1] [21-10664] (ECF: Susanne Sichta) [Entered: 03/11/2021 01:09 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 03/11/2021 as to Appellant John Maya. [Entered: 03/11/2021 12:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Joseph Hamrick for John Maya [21-10664] (ECF: Joseph Hamrick) [Entered: 03/04/2021 11:50 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Joseph Hamrick for John Maya. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10664] (ECF: Joseph Hamrick) [Entered: 03/04/2021 11:52 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant John Maya was filed on 01/29/2021. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 03/02/2021 10:13 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant John Maya on 02/26/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 03/02/2021 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
