Center for Individual Rights v. Irina Chevaldina
| GELBER SCHACHTER & GREENBERG |
| IRINA CHEVALDINA |
| CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS |
| 21-10698 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Center for Individual Rights [21-10698] (ECF: Michael Rosman) [Entered: 04/12/2021 05:12 PM] |
ORDER: The motion for extension of time to and including July 1, 2021 in which to file Appellants brief is GRANTED, with the appendix due seven (7) days from the filing of the brief. [ # 9345671-2 ] BCG (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/06/2021 02:18 PM]
|
| Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellee Irina Chevaldina. [Entered: 04/08/2021 09:25 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Irina Chevaldina. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/31/2021 09:44 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file appellant's brief to 07/01/2021 filed by Center for Individual Rights. Motion is Opposed. [9345671-1] [21-10698] (ECF: Michael Rosman) [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:48 PM] |
| JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Center for Individual Rights. [Entered: 03/29/2021 09:44 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael E. Rosman for Appellant Center for Individual Rights. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10698] (ECF: Michael Rosman) [Entered: 03/17/2021 11:27 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to David Scott Mandel, Nina Stillman Mandel, Michael E. Rosman and Michelle A. Scott for Center for Individual Rights. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page AND have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/17/2021 09:58 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael E. Rosman for Center for Individual Rights. [21-10698] (ECF: Michael Rosman) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:03 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Michael E. Rosman for Appellant Center for Individual Rights. No hearings. [21-10698] (ECF: Michael Rosman) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:04 AM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 03/02/2021 as to Appellant Center for Individual Rights. [Entered: 03/08/2021 06:42 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Center for Individual Rights on 03/02/2021. Fee Status: Fee Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 04/12/2021. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/16/2021 as to Appellant Center for Individual Rights. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 03/30/2021 as to Appellee Irina Chevaldina [Entered: 03/08/2021 06:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
