Christopher Lee v. Governor of Alabama, et al
Defendant / Appellee: STEVEN T. MARSHALL, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, In his official capacity, KAY IVEY, Governor of the State of Alabama, In her official capacity, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, Governor of the State of Alabama, In her official capacity and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, In his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER LEE
Case Number: 21-10739
Filed: March 4, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Christopher Lee failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/30/2021 11:42 AM]
March 30, 2021 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion for relief from the obligation to pay in advance is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 03/30/2021 10:33 AM]
March 12, 2021 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Christopher Lee. No hearings. [Entered: 03/12/2021 08:16 AM]
March 4, 2021 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christopher Lee on 03/03/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Lee v. Governor of Alabama, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEVEN T. MARSHALL, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, In his official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KAY IVEY, Governor of the State of Alabama, In her official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, Governor of the State of Alabama, In her official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, In his official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTOPHER LEE
Represented By: Christopher Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?