Roosevelt Lee, Jr. v. Warden
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant: ROOSEVELT LEE, JR.
Case Number: 21-10814
Filed: March 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Notice of filing Prisoner Financial Statement as to appellant. [Entered: 05/04/2021 05:19 PM]
April 16, 2021 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Roosevelt Lee, Jr. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9364457-1] [Entered: 04/20/2021 01:47 PM]
April 16, 2021 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Roosevelt Lee, Jr.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9364952-1] [Entered: 04/21/2021 08:49 AM]
April 9, 2021 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Meghan Hobbs Hill for Appellee Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-10814] (ECF: Meghan Hill) [Entered: 04/09/2021 10:32 AM]
April 9, 2021 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Meghan Hobbs Hill for Warden. [21-10814] (ECF: Meghan Hill) [Entered: 04/09/2021 10:11 AM]
April 7, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christopher Michael Carr for Warden and Meghan Hobbs Hill for Warden. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:53 PM]
April 5, 2021 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Roosevelt Lee, Jr.. [Entered: 04/07/2021 11:00 AM]
March 18, 2021 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Roosevelt Lee, Jr. was filed on 03/18/2021. Docket Entry 32. [Entered: 03/18/2021 06:57 PM]
March 16, 2021 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Roosevelt Lee, Jr. was filed on 12/03/2020. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 03/16/2021 11:44 AM]
March 8, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Roosevelt Lee, Jr. on 03/08/2021 USDC motion pending: Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis DE# 28 and Motion for Certificate of Appealability DE# 29 filed on 03/08/2021. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 03/16/2021 11:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roosevelt Lee, Jr. v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN
Represented By: Meghan Hobbs Hill
Represented By: Christopher Michael Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ROOSEVELT LEE, JR.
Represented By: Roosevelt Lee Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?