Deotis Blandburg v. Warden, et al
| TERRY BROWN, Lieutenant, AVERY MOODY, Medical Director, CORNELIUS, Correctional Officer, POPE, Correctional Offer and WARDEN |
| DEOTIS B. BLANDBURG |
| 21-11115 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Deotis B. Blandburg failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 05/06/2021 09:17 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Deotis B. Blandburg. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/03/2021 09:32 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Deotis B. Blandburg on 04/06/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 04/20/2021 as to Appellant Deotis B. Blandburg. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 05/04/2021 as to Appellee Terry Brown [Entered: 04/12/2021 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
